Home
- What
we do - 2005 Summer Workshop Review
GUILD
OF NATURAL SCIENCE ILLUSTRATORS, Inc.

|
| |
|
|
|
Along the coast of Maine, edging Dyer Bay, in woods where balsam fir, red spruce,
paper birch, red maple and eastern white cedar predominate, 150 acres form
a perfect setting for a workshop in natural science illustration. This retreat
is the Humboldt Field Research Institute and Eagle Hill Foundation, hosted
and coordinated by Joerg-Henner Lotze.
During the week of August 14-20, 2005, a combination workshop entitled “Secrets
of Scratchboard” and “Scratching the Surface: Metalpoint
Drawing” was
presented by Trudy Nicholson and Scott Rawlins. Fifteen participants from as
far as California, Wisconsin, Florida and Indiana, as well as locations closer
to Maine, put pen, pencil, silver and copper to varying surfaces from which emerged
an array of nature’s treasures—bark, shells, feathers, plants and
crab or lobster claws among them—in dramatic and elegant detail. The participants
ranged from students in natural science illustration, professional scientific
illustrators, environmental educators, and wildlife refuge managers, all anxious
to increase their skills in the techniques presented. The techniques were divided
into half days: mornings for scratchboard, afternoons for metalpoint. We stayed
in very comfortable rooms in the studio building or cabins, with a few participants
camping in their tents. We ate marvelous home-cooked meals and on chilly evenings
gathered after dinner in a spacious room with a large fieldstone fireplace warming
ourselves by a crackling fire. After classes and especially during meals conversations
and laughter reached a high pitch.
A course on lichens and bryophytes given by Fred Olday, a professor at The College
of the Atlantic, was held at the same time as our workshop. Students in that
course joined us for meals and gatherings. In the evenings there were lectures
or presentations, one being a display of all the artists’ portfolios and
artwork completed by that date. At the close of our final day, students exhibited
all the work they had done during the week. The unanimous reaction was amazement
at the amount and quality that had been accomplished. This was a week of discovery
of nature, illustration techniques, and each other.
Finding Our Way
There were no towns within walking distance. If there were
any necessities required, a member with a car was commandeered
for the trip—our usual driver was
Susannah Graedel, who even volunteered. Walking trails, marked by color spheres
on trees along the way, lead us through fields, meadows, and dense woods to
overlooks or the Dyer Bay shore. Although these paths were
marked and we were given a rudimentary
map of the path meanderings and final destinations, most outings lead to consternation
if in a group, or near panic if alone. But none of us remained lost for long
and we always managed to find clues that lead us back toward the compound.
Finding
Subjects
These paths led us through blueberry fields that provided sweet snacks along
the way, as well as producing subjects for illustrations. In the woods were
nuts, cones, branches, bark, leaves, and feathers. On the shore were stones,
seaweed,
crab shells, lobster claws, and driftwood. At the end of some paths were
high boulders overlooking woods far below, which lead to the Bay stretching
far
out past islands and boats. Here, atop these huge rocks providing such a
splendid view, were Jack pines with their curving cones, their trunks and
branches buffeted
to one side and stunted in this wind-exposed location—a lovely place for
contemplation, inspiration, and sketching. Laden with subjects, the artists returned
to the studio to sort out their subjects, choose the most promising, and arrange
compositions. The decisions required in selecting, preparing, and arranging subjects
is sometimes the most interesting and challenging part of the project, surpassed
perhaps by choosing the medium.
Comments on the Subjects and Media by Participants
“Gentle
Twists and Turns; Summer Seaweed”
“… There is a simplicity in working in silverpoint that has proven
to be extremely satisfying. Only one tool is necessary, whether drawing in the
field or in the studio, to produce an image that has both a delicate and luminous
quality…”
—Elizabeth Wyatt |
“ Mytilus
edulis: Blue Mussel”
“… I chose Mytilus edulis as the subject for my scratchboard project
because I was eager to learn how to render textures in pen and ink. I was attracted
by the challenge of depicting the glossiness of the inside of the shell and its
rough exterior. My picture of the blue mussel will remind me of the pleasure
and value of the class experience. It will also bring back memories of the special
late afternoon walks with classmates on the spectacular beach below Eagle Hill
where the glorious blue rack line of Mytilus edulis stretched as far as we could
see…”
—Susannah Graedel |
“ Moss”
“… this extravagant two-inch clump of moss presented itself to me.
It seemed like the perfect miniature landscape as I bent down on my hands and
knees to examine it…I knew that scratchboard would allow me the flexibility
necessary to pick out the fine fronds. I began with the most unlikely-looking,
brushy tonal study and alternately worked my way from black to white to black
and white again, continually refining the image by scratching through the dark
brushwork or re-inking with a fine pen…”
—David Taft |
“ Knot
Hole and Birch Leaf”
“ ...I chose this piece of bark because of the distinctive hole left by
a knot or branch. The background leaf [kept] the bark from ‘floating’ on
a white background and [added] a contrasting texture. I chose pencil on scratchboard
because of its potential to create depth through varied shades of light and dark…The
leaf was an easy choice [for a subject] once I realized I could scratch in the
light veins, and by using the right hardness of pencil could maintain an even
shade throughout the leaf. The burnishing technique allowed me to create smooth
areas…”
—Katie Schuler
|
“ Guaiacum
sanctum L.: lignum vitae”
“ ...I was asked to create a piece by a fellow graduate student at Miami
University based on this species. My first attempt was not at all successful.
When I was shown [the technique of] pencil on scratchboard I immediately thought
of redoing it in this medium…”
—Katy Levings |
The Techniques
Metalpoint
At a time when digital approaches to art-making are rapidly displacing
traditional ones, it is sometimes useful to reflect on the history of “making marks”,
and to occasionally move backward in order to stay ahead. Studying the
various techniques associated with metalpoint drawing can help artists
stay in touch
with the gestural and tactile qualities of mark-making.
Participants in the GNSI summer workshop learned how to build up tone through
a series of small hatched and cross-hatched lines, and also learned to appreciate
that there is beauty in delicate, sensitive drawings that would be difficult
to reproduce. Experimenting with a number of different grounds, including
LineKote board, a clay-coated surface, and Martha Stewart paint chips, participants
were encouraged to find a surface that accommodated their individual styles
most successfully.
In addition, participants learned how to create their own metalpoint ground
using illustration board and gouache.
As originally conceived, this portion of the workshop was to include numerous
excursions to Dyer Bay as well as a field trip to the coast proper, during
which participants could produce panoramic landscape studies. Though trips
were taken
to both locations, and some landscapes did result, it was concluded that
metalpoint seems to lend itself best to studies of closely observed objects.
Nevertheless,
the field trips did provide participants with many interesting subjects to
draw from seaweeds to lobster claws.
Toward the end of the week, techniques for tinting the metalpoint drawings
were introduced. These involved careful applications of watercolor and/or “painting” with
pastel dust.
The final collection of participants’ drawings exhibited a wide range
of styles, approaches, and subject matter. The metalpoint illustrations
provided
an interesting contrast to the bolder, high-contrast scratchboard renderings.
Scratchboard
Ink on white scratchboard has an intrinsic high contrast, dramatic
quality. The approach of analyzing subjects and compositions
to differentiate light
areas,
which will remain white, from darker areas, which will be painted black,
and only later blended by creating textural grays, enhances this quality.
In the workshop, participants created compositions of balanced lights
and darks using several subjects. Starting with a sketch that was transferred
to prepared
scratchboard, the compositions were divided into black and white areas
that
ultimately lead to highly textured renderings, using white scratched
lines and dots on black
areas, and black inked lines and dots on white areas. Being able to correct
by scratching out previously inked textures and reworking them or to
refine and
perfect inked details allows for experimentation and delicate precision.
The final result was a realistic duplication of the subjects ranging
from white
through textured grays to black, presented in an exciting composition.
Using graphite pencil on scratchboard required building up darks gradually
and finally scratching out fine white details and highlights. Creating
textures in
both ink and pencil was a challenge involving trials and practice, but
the results of all artists’ efforts were charismatic and rewarding.
|
Photo:
Katie Schuler
Photo:
Katie Schuler
Photo:
Susannah Graedel
Photo:
Katie Schuler
Photo:
Antonia Ross
Photo:
Susannah Graedel
Discarded
Lobster Crab Claw (Detail),
Valerie Storfer
Gentle
Twists and Turns; Summer Seaweed (Detail),
Elizabeth Wyatt
Photo:
Susannah Graedel
Photo:
Susannah Graedel More
photos and artwork in the Gallery!
Click here. |
| |
|
Interested
in finding out more about GNSI Summer workshops? Look for announcements
in upcoming Newsletter issues.
|
Home
| Contact the Guild |
WebmasterAll contents and design are
copyrighted © 1998-2005 Guild of Natural Science Illustrators, Inc. |